> -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:53 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Simplified pools > > On 04/06/10 06:00, Kevin Keane wrote: > > Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when > > manually running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool - > > even if you actually remembered to select the correct one. For > > instance, let's say that the most recent Differential job failed. You > > decide to re-run the job manually. Bacula is smart enough to upgrade > > the job from Incremental to Differential automatically, but it is not > > smart enough to move the job from the Incremental to the Differential > > pool. > > Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in Bacula-3 > and later, by changing the way overrides work.
Really? I see this problem in bacula 3.0.3 all the time. Maybe I need to change something in my configuration to take advantage of this new feature. How is it supposed to work? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
