On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You can write a udev rule to lock the drives down. I wrote one awhile
>> back to keep the changer device the same.
>>
>> dev6 ~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/55-bacula.rules
>> SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",ATTRS{vendor}=="EXABYTE*",ATTRS{type}=="8",
>> SYMLINK+="autochanger1 changer"
>>
>>
>> BTW, Is this swapping of drives causing any real problems?
>>
>
> I'm not having a problem with the changer, only the drives in the
> changer as they are separate targets and not LUNS of the changer.You should be able to write very similar rules to lock the drives down as long as something in the udev info can distinguish the drives. http://www.reactivated.net/writing_udev_rules.html http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/rhel-5-udev-devices-tape-configuration-problems-650429/ http://tolecnal.net/2007/04/writing-udev-rules And there is a mention of persistent tape devices names here: http://spectralmud.org/cgi-bin/dwww/usr/share/doc/udev/README.Debian.gz John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
