Hello,

can anyboby please confirm / correcxt the folloing assumptions:

Szenario: Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006),
          FD running on a x86_64 system (and compiled for 64 bit)
          DIR running on a 386 system (32 bit)

Tested: Backup and restore on the x86_64 work fine

Now, after a hardware crash, I tried to restore a backup written by
the 64 bit FD on a 32 bit system. This resulted in serious chaos:

- lots of error messages like these:

  sisyphus-fd: -rw-r--r--   1 root     root         94600 2006-12-29 10:57:49  
/restore/FULL/boot/memtest86+-1.65
  30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337 
File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/memtest86+-1.65 not correct. 
Original 94600, restored 160136.
  sisyphus-fd: -rw-r--r--   1 root     root         98989 2007-01-19 12:32:42  
/restore/FULL/boot/symvers-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.gz
  30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337 
File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/symvers-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.gz 
not correct. Original 98989, restored 295597.
  sisyphus-fd: -rw-------   1 root     root       1568757 2007-01-19 12:32:56  
/restore/FULL/boot/initrd-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.img
  30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337 
File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/initrd-2.6.19-1.2895.fc6xen.img 
not correct. Original 1568757, restored 3272693.
  sisyphus-fd: -rwxr-xr-x   1 root     root        642376 2007-04-18 18:13:35  
/restore/FULL/boot/xen-syms-2.6.20-1.2944.fc6
  30-May 12:13 sisyphus-fd: Restore.2007-05-30_12.12.53 Error: attribs.c:337 
File size of restored file /restore/FULL/boot/xen-syms-2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 not 
correct. Original 642376, restored 1232200.
  ...

- the restored files often contained wrong data; it looks as  if  the
  data were correct, but did belong to other file names


Is it correct to assume that there is a general incompatibility of 32
and 64 bit systems in that old version of Bacula?

I've seen comments ("The database Id  records  should  be  32/64  bit
independent now.") about new features in 1.40.0, so can I assume that
this problem has been fixed for the 2.x releases?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be
sure."                                  - Corporal Hicks, in "Aliens"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to