On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:03, James Ray wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
> >> All,
> >> I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
> >> address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
> >> not the default system address.
> >>
> >> I have just tried to do this with IPTables and source NATing but due to
> >> a bug in the Fedora Kernel (or what seems to be) I get a panic ;(
> >>
> >> Any ideas other than me writing a quick patch to do it?
> >
> > Could you explain in detail why you would want to do this?
> >
> > Could you explain what components you are talking about when you say you
are
> > wanting "communications from bacula"? (Director, Console, File daemon,
> > Storage daemon), and to where? (each of the daemons carry on several
> > different kinds of network conversations -- Dir=3, Console=1, FD=2, SD=2).
> > See the daemon interconnection picture in the beginning of the manual for
the
> > details of who talks to whom.
> >
> > Also, could you explain how it is possible to use a different address than
the
> > one which is "assigned" to your computer?
> >
>
> We have a concept of a system address (the machine itself) and a service
> address (one for each service, say .2 == an apache service, .3 == an
> bacula service, .4 == a dns service, where as .1 is a _system_ address)
> all the interfaces will be on the same machine.
>
> So any communications coming _from_ the bacula service need to come out
> of .3 and any connections to the bacula service need to head onto .3 also.
>
> What I have seen (only on my breif testing) is that the listen address
> is the .3 address (as I set in DirAddress) but the outcoming connections
> from the bacula-dir to the bacula-fd across the network originate for
> the system default address of .1...
I have no idea how to control which address is used for outgoing
communications other than by configuring your network gateway to go through
the preferred device, which may not do exactly what you want.
In any event, unless I am misunderstanding something, Bacula has no mechanism
for controlling outgoing addresses.
>
> I shall re-test and post my outcomes.
>
> --
> James Ray. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Computing Services
> Queen Mary, University of London
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
