On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:

> On Monday 09 October 2006 16:17, James Ray wrote:
> > Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Unfortunately that is not possible in my case. So as I understand the
> > rest of this thread, yes my assumption is right, but no bacula can't
> > (Kern, and won't?) support binding to a source IP address for out going
> > connections?
> >
>
> I don't recall having said anything about "won't".  I did say that Bacula
> cannot, IMO, do what you want, and that I don't know off hand how to
> implement it.
>
> It also seems to me from the email exchanged that your request is a special
> case, which means that it is unlikely something I would implement personally
> unless the users indicate by a vote that it is of high importance.
>
> Enhancements to Bacula other than me implementing features either come from a
> submitted and accepted patch or a Feature Request (as described on the web
> site) that is prioritized by the users and then implemented by someone.

The source is provided - this shouldn't be a horribly difficult patch.
You can set the source IP address when opening the socket.

j

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to