On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Monday 09 October 2006 16:17, James Ray wrote: > > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > ... > > > > Unfortunately that is not possible in my case. So as I understand the > > rest of this thread, yes my assumption is right, but no bacula can't > > (Kern, and won't?) support binding to a source IP address for out going > > connections? > > > > I don't recall having said anything about "won't". I did say that Bacula > cannot, IMO, do what you want, and that I don't know off hand how to > implement it. > > It also seems to me from the email exchanged that your request is a special > case, which means that it is unlikely something I would implement personally > unless the users indicate by a vote that it is of high importance. > > Enhancements to Bacula other than me implementing features either come from a > submitted and accepted patch or a Feature Request (as described on the web > site) that is prioritized by the users and then implemented by someone.
The source is provided - this shouldn't be a horribly difficult patch. You can set the source IP address when opening the socket. j ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users