> In any case, if you find yourself using bscan and bextract, you are
> probably using Bacula incorrectly.
>
> The recommended workaround is to use Bacula to restore file
> rather than bextract.

It's very likely in the case in question that I was working in a wrong way.
Actually, I just had installed a clean system where I needed to import old
data, but I had a few hours extra time available. So I happened to have an
excellent opportunity to experiment those tools (bscan, bextraxt) I had
never user before, and I wanted to try them so now I've tried them before I
really may need to use them in the future.

Anyway, I got done what I had to do (yes, I finally used Bacula to restore
the data) so this time there were no actual problem from my point of view. I
just wanted to know if those messages I met were due to some mistake from my
side, or due to a software 'feature'.


> I've put this problem on the list of things to be fixed.
>
Propably not the most urgent one. Thanks.


Regards,
Timo



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to