On Saturday 29 July 2006 22:39, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > I'm repeating my posting of July 20th below, since there were no comments > last time. > Are "unknown stream type 15" and "this should not happen" an expectable > behaviour due to Linux ACLs or related to something else?
Yes, these are Unix ACLs. Someone forgot to make bscan ignore them, so you can ignore the messages. > > > **1** While rebuilding the catalog with bscan, I'm getting a huge number of > messages like this: > > bscan: bscan.c:735 Unknown stream type!!! stream=15 data=user::rwx > group::rw- > other::r-- > > In the beginnging, bscan was running nicely for a while. Then bconsole > screen started scrolling with these messages, no idea about how many there > were. Tens of thousands maybe, but I guess it's irrelevant. The whole backup > was appr. 160000 files. > > Could this be related to linux ACLs ? Does bscan possibly get confused with > them? > The backup in question is a full backup from a file server, and the largest > partition had quotas and acls enabled. > While running the original backup, there was "aclsupport = yes" in the > fileset options. > > > **2** Before running the bscan, I also ran bextract with the same tape, and > it looks to me that those few files that had acls in use, had obviously lost > all acl information. At that time there also were messages that mentioned > "stream=15" and something like "this should not happen". I have no idea > about how many that kind of messages there were during bextract run, since I > just saw the final screen. Unfortunately I don't have the exact message from > bextract available. > > > Bacula version is 1.38.11-3, self-built from source rpm. > FC5 & MySQL, Exabyte VXA-320 Autoloader. > Backup was written with the same version of Bacula, but on FC4. > > At least at this time this isn't an urgent issue. The only real problem I > know so far were the lost acls, and they were nothing important yet (but may > be at the next time) but mostly related to some experiments. > Mostly I'm just curious to know why software keeps saying "this should not > happen"... > > Btw, a regular restore that was based on the rebuilt catalog finished right > now. It seems to have been able restore the acls too. Looks that bextract / > bscan don't support acls. Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if that's also > documented somewhere in the "Bacula Bible", but I just couldn't find it > there... The ACLs are on the volumes, but not in the catalog, so bscan should just ignore those records. Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in the 1.39 code stream. Regards, Kern > > > Regards, > Timo > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
