> > **2** Before running the bscan, I also ran bextract with the same tape, and > > it looks to me that those few files that had acls in use, had obviously lost > > all acl information. At that time there also were messages that mentioned > > "stream=15" and something like "this should not happen". I have no idea > >
> The ACLs are on the volumes, but not in the catalog, so bscan should just > ignore those records. > > Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed it in the 1.39 code stream. > Is there also a fix to issue 2 above? That is, running bextract does not restore the ACLs, although it restores the actual files? Regards, Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
