On Tuesday 27 June 2006 19:05, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > This system seems to be set up in the beginning of February, and the
> > first version of Bacula that was run there has been 1.38.5
> > In that system, there is bacula-sd.9103.state file at all.
>
> Oops. The last line above should be:
> ....there is NO bacula-sd.9103.state file at all.
>
> (which means, that no SD since 1.38.5 has been able to write to this
> directory)
If you installed from rpms, we initially had a few problems getting all the
permissions right to run the SD properly. I believe that it is all
straightened out now.
There should be a user:group bacula:bacula
Basically, the SD should run as bacula:disk (user:group)
/var/bacula should be root:bacula
and the user bacula should be in group bacula.
With that, I think everyone has the correct permissions. I am not very good
at all this user:group stuff, so if anyone has other ideas, please say so.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
