On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:04:31PM +0100, Alan Brown wrote: > On Sat, 20 May 2006, John Goerzen wrote: > > >We had three labeled, but otherwise completely unused, tapes in the > >pool. Two were in the changer, and Bacula knew this. Yet for some > >inexplicable reason, it decided it wanted the tape that wasn't in the > >changer! (All three were showing Appendable). I finally set that tape > >Destroyed (or Deactivated or whatever that option was), ran mount again, > >and then things worked. > > What was/is the Inchanger flag of the tape Bacula was asking for set to?
It was set to 0 at the time according to list volumes, so Bacula knew it wasn't in the changer already. Highly odd. > Every time I've seen this, Bacula has decided that the requested tape is > alreday in the changer. Older versions never set Inchanger=0 > automatically. This is 1.38.9, which seems to set inchanger=0 appropriately based on the results from "update slots". Thanks, -- John ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
