Hi,

We have Solaris 10 Servers, 3x Sun V240, one of them is the backup-server
with the storage deamon and director the others are backed up to the tape at
the backup-server.

The backup-server has a 1.3GHz CPU and 1Gb RAM, U320 SCSI-Kontroller (on
board) and a second U320 controller with the Tandberg SDLT320 tapedrive.
Networkspeed is at 1Gbit. We alos testet some transfers with "Pipe Magic
Tools" and get more then 30Mb/s in the average. The disks I testet with
bonnie++ and the write/reed is more then 30Mb/s.

We compiled bacula to work with postgre-sql.

All your tips did'nt change anything, I have only a throuput of arround
300-350Kb/s. I also added the spooling-parameter.

With spooling it takes arround 10-20min to spool data and write them down to
tape at 2MB/s. But the save of the attributes (writing to the catalog) needs
2h or more!

I tried many combinations and recompiled bacula also with Postgres 8.1,
Postgres 8.0, with CFLAGS=-O2/CXXFLAGS=-O2....

I compiled it with gcc 3.4.4, which I compiled myself, because on solaris 10
there is'nt any binary distribution.

I think that there are 2 Problems, one is the performance of Bacula or
Postgres itself  and also some problems with the tape. I did'nt get more
then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris.

Anybody can help?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 PM
> To: Ribi Roland
> Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I changed the MaximumNetworkBufferSize to 65536 in the file 
> and storage
> daemon configuration and increased the MaximumBlockSize to 
> 262144 in the
> storage daemon configuration.
> 
> If you change the MaximumBlockSize you must run the btape 
> tests again so
> you are sure the value is valid for your tape drive.
> 
> I think the MaximumNetworkBufferSize was the parameter that 
> gave me the
> performance increase.
> 
> What do you think of adding more performance testing tools to bacula?
> 
> What system do you have (hardware, os, tape, disk)?
> 
> Please reply with your results.
> 
> /Ove
> 
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:02, Ribi Roland wrote:
> > How did you increase the performance?
> > 
> > I have the same slow system (arround 300Kb/s), what did you 
> change in the
> > configuration, which did help to increase the performance?
> > 
> > It would help me...
> > 
> > Thank You
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 12:31 PM
> > > To: bacula-users
> > > Subject: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula 
> configuration
> > > and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some 
> > > source code
> > > I increased it from 300KB/s to 3MB/s when backuping the root 
> > > filesystem.
> > > 
> > > After reading the mail lists I found out that I was not the 
> > > first bacula
> > > user with performance problems and I do not think I will 
> be the last.
> > > 
> > > One thing I was missing while doing this was more tools to 
> > > test and tune
> > > the performance of tape, database, network and reading files.
> > > 
> > > btape has great functions for testing if the tape drive and 
> > > autochanger
> > > is working but I would like it to test different parameters 
> > > and suggest
> > > changes to my configuration. I do not mind if would take a 
> > > long time to
> > > do this because it would take me a lot longer to do it myself.
> > > 
> > > Network performance would be much easier to test and tune 
> if I could
> > > tell a file daemon to send data to a storage daemon and report the
> > > transfer rate without reading files, updating database or 
> writing to
> > > tape.
> > > 
> > > Reading files can be done in a similar way by telling a 
> file daemon to
> > > read files and report the transfer rate without sending the 
> > > files to any
> > > storage daemon.
> > > 
> > > I do not know how to test and tune the database...
> > > but someone must know ;-)
> > > 
> > > When/If these tools are available it would be possible to write a
> > > performance tuning tool to help users to test and tune 
> their bacula
> > > configuration.
> > > 
> > > Is it possible to do this?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App 
> > > Server. Download
> > > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or 
> your very own
> > > Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: 
> http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bacula-users mailing list
> > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> > > 
> 




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to