Hi, We have Solaris 10 Servers, 3x Sun V240, one of them is the backup-server with the storage deamon and director the others are backed up to the tape at the backup-server.
The backup-server has a 1.3GHz CPU and 1Gb RAM, U320 SCSI-Kontroller (on board) and a second U320 controller with the Tandberg SDLT320 tapedrive. Networkspeed is at 1Gbit. We alos testet some transfers with "Pipe Magic Tools" and get more then 30Mb/s in the average. The disks I testet with bonnie++ and the write/reed is more then 30Mb/s. We compiled bacula to work with postgre-sql. All your tips did'nt change anything, I have only a throuput of arround 300-350Kb/s. I also added the spooling-parameter. With spooling it takes arround 10-20min to spool data and write them down to tape at 2MB/s. But the save of the attributes (writing to the catalog) needs 2h or more! I tried many combinations and recompiled bacula also with Postgres 8.1, Postgres 8.0, with CFLAGS=-O2/CXXFLAGS=-O2.... I compiled it with gcc 3.4.4, which I compiled myself, because on solaris 10 there is'nt any binary distribution. I think that there are 2 Problems, one is the performance of Bacula or Postgres itself and also some problems with the tape. I did'nt get more then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris. Anybody can help? > -----Original Message----- > From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 PM > To: Ribi Roland > Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning > > > Hi, > > I changed the MaximumNetworkBufferSize to 65536 in the file > and storage > daemon configuration and increased the MaximumBlockSize to > 262144 in the > storage daemon configuration. > > If you change the MaximumBlockSize you must run the btape > tests again so > you are sure the value is valid for your tape drive. > > I think the MaximumNetworkBufferSize was the parameter that > gave me the > performance increase. > > What do you think of adding more performance testing tools to bacula? > > What system do you have (hardware, os, tape, disk)? > > Please reply with your results. > > /Ove > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:02, Ribi Roland wrote: > > How did you increase the performance? > > > > I have the same slow system (arround 300Kb/s), what did you > change in the > > configuration, which did help to increase the performance? > > > > It would help me... > > > > Thank You > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 12:31 PM > > > To: bacula-users > > > Subject: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula > configuration > > > and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some > > > source code > > > I increased it from 300KB/s to 3MB/s when backuping the root > > > filesystem. > > > > > > After reading the mail lists I found out that I was not the > > > first bacula > > > user with performance problems and I do not think I will > be the last. > > > > > > One thing I was missing while doing this was more tools to > > > test and tune > > > the performance of tape, database, network and reading files. > > > > > > btape has great functions for testing if the tape drive and > > > autochanger > > > is working but I would like it to test different parameters > > > and suggest > > > changes to my configuration. I do not mind if would take a > > > long time to > > > do this because it would take me a lot longer to do it myself. > > > > > > Network performance would be much easier to test and tune > if I could > > > tell a file daemon to send data to a storage daemon and report the > > > transfer rate without reading files, updating database or > writing to > > > tape. > > > > > > Reading files can be done in a similar way by telling a > file daemon to > > > read files and report the transfer rate without sending the > > > files to any > > > storage daemon. > > > > > > I do not know how to test and tune the database... > > > but someone must know ;-) > > > > > > When/If these tools are available it would be possible to write a > > > performance tuning tool to help users to test and tune > their bacula > > > configuration. > > > > > > Is it possible to do this? > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App > > > Server. Download > > > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or > your very own > > > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: > http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bacula-users mailing list > > > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users