Mike wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to be setting up a new backup "system" for my work in the next
> couple of days,
> and I'm interested in using a new (1.37.38) version of Bacula (as I'm
> interested in the
> database changes, and the SSL support)- but I'm a little wary since
> 1.37.38 is still
> flagged as beta-
>
> Is there anybody running the 1.37 strain in production? Is there any major
> known
> issues that would make we want to avoid this release?
>
> I'd rather not have to install 1.36, then upgrade the database/clients/etc
> once a (possibly)
> more stable release comes out.

I am the same position. I have decided to pause the whole project until
1.38. I'm basing this decision on the fact that there is a lot of new
features in this release and I definately don't want to roll out a flawed
product on the network.

I suggest you could fill the time gap with a further process of testing
and evaluating the things you do have in place (server, a few clients,
whatever media you are using). It should mean you are better prepared when
the release arrives.

> Thanks for your help,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike Pultz
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to