Stephen McConnell wrote: ...
First of all - I would love to be able to see a comparison.Then let's hold off for now. I want to be clear on this: I don't care what build tool we choose in the end, but I want to see a fair comparison. Fair in the conditions I mean, then everyone can decide as he wants. Decisions based on emotions, especially technical ones, are never good.
Can you point me to a Java project at Apache using Centipede for project management?Jakarta POI is in the progress of conversion to the new centipede. I'll tell you when it's "ready" to evaluate.
In the meantime, Jeff and I and many others are more than capable of fixing any Ant problem we may have. I'm having difficulty in partecipating actively in these days, but I'll be responsive on specific questions and needs.
Secondly, I don't want to see Jason's 20 POMs committed (they a minimal and don't address thinigs like test cases and some of the annomolies in some of the Avalon projects).Ok, from the mails it seems that you are not the only one, although it confuses me a bit since you propose to use Maven... anyway, it seems that the result is to go with Ant till stable releases.
This means that we need to find a way of comparing Maven and Centipede... should we enable multiple build tools in sandbox to see how they work? I think it's in the best interest of all.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
