On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 22:39, Sam Ruby wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > Ant is not a typical project, as Maven isn't. Both are at the top of the > > food chain so to speak. I think primarily projects are interested in 1) > > making sure they have their act together internally 2) trying to build > > their entire project from source and if all that is easy they might find > > some time to lend toward grand build from source. And I'm sure there are > > people interested but currently don't have time (myself included). > > I would think that Maven developers would be interested in knowing if > their changes were likely to end up breaking others, but what do I know. > ;-)
I rely on the functional tests (the touchstone) that are in maven to make sure we work as advertised. I know there are no technical barriers to getting the Gump style build to work and I will eventually get some time to put toward it. > > There hasn't been a project yet I haven't been able to split up in a > > reactor. I've also been looking at Axis as I'm trying to help replace > > Sun libraries in the ebXml project I'm working on so I'm getting familar > > with Axis. > > Cool! Cross posting this to the general@ws mailing list. My guess is > that Dims will be very interested in this... > > - Sam Ruby > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
