Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> writes: > So we should maybe go (after the next major release) with this naming > scheme for the branches? > > * maint -> for next micro version > * stable -> for next minor version > * master -> for next major version
That seems to match common practice, insofar as I understand it... [Another consideration is whether you have a single named branch for maintenance (e.g. "maint", and "stable"), or just use version-named branches (and thus can maintain multiple versions simultaneously).] -miles -- Future, n. That period of time in which our affairs prosper, our friends are true and our happiness is assured.
