On 02/28/2013 12:00 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > [SNIP] > > What I meant was that you can use (some of) my above proposed merges > to go forward with the new role for master instead of requiring help > from Savannah to allow rewriting master. > So... now are you ok with *completing* my branch renaming instead of reverting the part of it that has already been done? Puzzled...
>> As I said, if you reach a consensus on that (and I guess you will), >> feel free to go ahead with that. No objection from me. > > You are the maintainer, I'm just stating my opinion. I honestly don't > know what I think is best to do now, when the rewriting has already > started but not yet completed. I guess it's your mess, and I don't > really want to take responsibility for it by stepping in and trying > to clear it up. I.e., I will only offer my opinion at this point. > Fine, I'll revert the partial branch renaming when I have time to do that with enough care and attention to avoid another half-done botch-up (might be few days or a week or more; please don't push to the repo in the meantime). > [BIG SNIP] Regards, Stefano
