On 2013-02-27 10:28, Peter Rosin wrote: > The long winding "eyes glossing over" discussion about version numbers > had nothing in it about branches, except the initial proposal which > stated: > > * None of 'maint', 'master' and 'next' should be rewindable. > > I was not aware that 'master' and 'next' were rewindable before.
I meant 'maint', not 'next', in the last sentence. Of course. Cheers, Peter
