I removed cpan from the CC ilst. rms> Does "no license changes" mean that the modified version is also rms> released with notices saying "dual Artistic | GPL"? In that rms> case, the situation seems perfectly explicit and clear. Akim, I'm satisfied that we're ok distributing our own Class::Struct. Do you think we should just rename the module? Or keep the name and add a configure test? Tom
- Automake: use of modified Perl modules & GPL Akim Demaille
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Tom Tromey
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Akim Demaille
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Akim Demaille
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Steve M. Robbins
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Richard Stallman
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Automake: use of modified Perl modules & ... Alexandre Oliva