>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexandre> Hmm... It's just occurred to me that this kind of test may
Alexandre> not work in general. AFAIK, some old Unices just won't run
Alexandre> shell-scripts like that; you have to explicitly specify the
Alexandre> shell that must run them. I'd love to be proven wrong, but
Alexandre> if I'm right, it defeats the whole testing mechanism. We
Alexandre> can't have an executable, because then we'd need a compiler
Alexandre> for the build machine, and we can't have a script because
Alexandre> we may have to explicitly specify a shell, and then, then
Alexandre> shell may not search the PATH.
It seems to me that falling to `:' is way enough for this case.
