> > I'd like to volunteer to handle anything DOS/DJGPP-related if > > possible. > > Thanks! Same here. > I'd like to advise you that it would be fair not to support non-UNIX path > separators on the build system. Naturally, I'll have to disagree. I don't see why Autoconf should care which path separator is used as long as Autoconf can figure it out. > On the other hand, support for non-UNIX path separators on the host would > be a feature that very few people need. It falls outside the area of > "generic" macros that Autoconf contains. I don't think I'd call the roughly 85% of people that use operating systems with a non-Unix path separator "very few". Mark
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Mark E.
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Earnie Boyd
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder