> > I'd like to advise you that it would be fair not to support non-UNIX path > > separators on the build system. Autoconf doesn't pretend to support such > > systems. > Then what's the point of supporting DJGPP, OS/2 or Mingw32 (which autoconf I understand that Mingw32 is supported with the Cygwin's shell (bash or /bin/sh). I don't know the status of support for DJGPP and OS/2. > DOES pretend to do)? DJGPP can pretend to be unixy when it comes to pathseps, > but ONLY inside bash (granted, that's where it will matter most, but using ':' > because bash can handle it would break if used inside perl/m4/whatever). Since the test is run by bash and not by something else it may be very tricky to determine the path separator unless you have perl/m4/whatever. Well, maybe if you try ";" first it should work. Regards, Pavel Roskin
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Pavel Roskin
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Mark E.
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Earnie Boyd
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Akim Demaille
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Alexandre Oliva
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) Tim Van Holder