Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] I mean if you do cc conftest.c -o conftest, and afterwards > there is no file "conftest", but there is a file "conftest.exe" that > wasn't there before, that should be pretty conclusive, no? Not really, no. For instance, Cygwin does this funny thing where they map all files named ``something.exe'' to also match any inquires to a file named ``something''. So you could do: $ cat > conftest.c int main(void) { return 0; } ^D $ gcc -o conftest.exe conftest.c $ ls conftest.exe conftest.c $ ls conftest conftest $ And further: $ rm conftest.exe $ ls conftest* conftest.c $ gcc -o conftest conftest.c $ ls conftest.exe conftest.c $ (So, in the Cygwin case it doesn't really matter whether you set the executable suffix to ".exe" or "", I guess.) Regards, Morten
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- RE: AC_PROG_CC not working Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd