On 10 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > >>>>> "Morten" == Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know. To be honest, I'm starting to despair: there are way > too many things that need to be completely redesigned in Autoconf, but > *we can't wait*. 2.50 is already significantly superior to 2.13, and > we need to stop somewhere. We need to stop for a while, knowing it's I don't much care how many features you add if the old configure.in scripts do not work properly. (When is 2.49b coming out so we can see if some of the bugs are fixed?) -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut