On 10 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > > I don't know. To be honest, I'm starting to despair: there are way > too many things that need to be completely redesigned in Autoconf, but > *we can't wait*. 2.50 is already significantly superior to 2.13, and > we need to stop somewhere. We need to stop for a while, knowing it's > far from being perfect, and then, for 2.51, address one single big > issue, and so on for the other releases. Please take a moment to release stable and compatible versions of Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool so that there is a new baseline for us users. This is what the development community needs. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen