Re: Bootstrapping compiler-support libraries

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Aug  7, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> should be addressed in 2.51, not 2.51.

???

> real needs, but I do believe asking something valid for both 2.50 and
> 2.13 is asking for too much.

You don't understand.  I want something that works for 2.50 in 2.50.
I'll take care of the fallback for autoconf 2.13 in GCC itself.  I
just wouldn't like to have two different fallbacks for 2.13 and 2.50,
having the real thing only in 2.51.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me