Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Paul> Not yet, unfortunately, and partly this is due to inadequate
Paul> research on my part; please see below.  (Sorry about that.)

Wow, thanks Paul.

But really, personally, currently I don't have time to devote to
this.  2.50 should be coming though.  There are too many open issues.

I am willing to forget about this until 2.50 is out.  Then we will
have plenty of time to polish the various compilers' issue (there is
also the issue of input file extensions etc.).

I keep your message preciously.

Paul>    + -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 \

Paul> This is just a minor point, but is the "=1" really needed here?
Paul> -Dx is equivalent to -Dx=1 on all compilers that I've ever heard
Paul> of.

I used this to actually have a value to pass to AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED.  I
need a value here.