Greg A Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, the only reason lots of recent code can't compile in K&R mode is > because its authors are either lazy, or ignorant (of C's heritage), or > both! ;-) One of the primary motivations for switching INN to ANSI C is that most of the contributors were used to writing ANSI C, not K&R C, and trying to maintain a K&R source base would involve tons of extra work for the maintainers rewriting all that code. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Alexandre Oliva
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Greg A. Woods
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Russ Allbery
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Greg A. Woods
- RE: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Bernard Dautrevaux