Akim Demaille writes: > Bruno> Well, as Paul Eggert said, it is preferrable to try to append > Bruno> "-Ae" to $CC (and $CPP) instead of defining _HPUX_SOURCE. "cc > Bruno> -Ae" gives you "long long" support, which _HPUX_SOURCE doesn't. > > Yep, maybe, but I fear it is somewhat different: does it mean you're > requiring ANSI C? If it does not, then fine with me. "cc -Ae" (equivalent to "cc -Aa -D_HPUX_SOURCE +e", where "+e" enables "HP value-added features", i.e. some C language features which are not strictly ANSI C) groks both ANSI C and K&R C syntaxes. Whereas plain "cc -D_HPUX_SOURCE" does not grok ANSI C source, only K&R source. Bruno
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SO... Akim Demaille
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Paul Eggert
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Alexandre Oliva
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Bruno Haible
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Greg A. Woods
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Russ Allbery
- Re: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Greg A. Woods
- RE: need to define _ISOC99_SOURCE Bernard Dautrevaux