On Jul 26, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But you seem to say let's go for it, it cannot do harm. I think it > does: we might have packages that configure well and fail to compile. That's why I suggest that this option of testing alternate extensions be enabled only when a certain autoconf macro is called. It mustn't be automatic, precisely because it requires support from the developer. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Paul D. Smith
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille