Dear Alexandre Oliva, you wrote on Yesterday: > Not really. This should be enough: > > .$(CXXEXT).o: ; $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ > .cc.cpp: ; $(LN_S) $@ $< > .cc.cxx: ; $(LN_S) $@ $< > .cc.C: ; $(LN_S) $@ $< Are you certain ?? This didn't work for my .F/.f stuff, because the first rtule will be ignored by make if CXXEXT != .cc and if there is a built-in rule .cc.o. Your first suggestion seems threfore more robust to me, because it rewrites the .cc.o rule. -- Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstr. 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany Tel. +49-341-2352151 / Fax +49-341-2352361
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Lassi A. Tuura
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Russ Allbery
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Mo DeJong
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Paul D. Smith
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva