On Jul 26, 2000, Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but what is the developer supposed > to do to "support" this? Write the suffix-conversion rules in Makefile.in. If he's using automake, automake could take care of that, but autoconf doesn't generate Makefile rules. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Paul D. Smith
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Martin Wilck
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: aclang.m4 problem (Cygwin + VC++) Akim Demaille