Akim Demaille wrote:
> dv> However, if I'm right about this, that should be clearly documented,
> dv> probably in the `writing macros' section.
>
> Well, you are right, it is new that they are being renamed, before
> they were just removed :)
Oh my God :-)
> currently the Autoconf documentation does not document such low level
> `details'.
Quoting "details" was a wise thing to do ;-)
> Still, I have the strong belief that you cannot use low level macros for
> Autoconf without reading the code itself, so...
But I use low level macros not because I want to, but because I *need*
to. Sounds like autoconf's most well known misfeature strikes back to me... As
an autoconf user, you known that you can write your own macros using m4. It is
then very unpleasant to discover that m4's behavior is silently modified.
That's why I'm saying that this should be documented.
> Alternatively, someone might want to start a documentation of libm4.
> Hint hint...
Ah, I see. :-p
--
/ / _ _ Didier Verna http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
- / / - / / /_/ / EPITA / LRDE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/ / /_/ / /__ / 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
94276 Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99
