Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey A Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeffrey> You can't depend on ksh or sh5 being available on 4.3BSD
> Jeffrey> boxes and the 4.3BSD shell certainly does not support shell
> Jeffrey> functions.
> Hi Jeff,
> Thanks for the feedback. But I am still suspicious. There are way
> too many myths around Autoconf, and I'm willing to believe what I see.
> Have you really tried? Ultrix for instance does support the
> functions, while nobody would have bet.
I'm sure Michael will point out that pure 4.3BSD definitely won't have
anything named "/bin/sh5" and never will, and that people are still
running pure 4.3BSD. (I'm not sure how many people outside of Michael
that is, but I'm sure there are some.)
I agree, 99.99% of the systems out there will have a shell somewhere that
supports shell functions and is a Bourne-like shell; it's just a question
of how small the percentage of affected systems becomes and how much
autoconf would gain from dropping the restriction.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
