On May 8, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Sokolov) wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is currently believed that every system has at least *some*
>> shell implementation that supports functions [...]
> 4.3BSD doesn't!
Is /bin/sh the only Bourne shell-like shell available on the system?
No /bin/ksh, /bin/sh5 or some other extended shell that supports shell
functions? If that's true, you've just solved one of the
long-standing doubts the new autoconf maintainers have had for quite
some time.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me