>>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Does [testing the signedness] make sense for other types than `char'? Bruno> Yes. In particular size_t and wchar_t come to mind. Wow, signed size_t :) Where can we see that? What effect can it have so that you might need to check for it? How to you cure this? I don't know wchar_t too well, but I'm very sad to learn that even for very recent designs, we still face the same old mistakes. It's like seeing the 70's shaking hands with the 2000's. Akim
- suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK... Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Peter Eisentraut
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Peter Eisentraut
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Alexandre Oliva