On May 19, 2000, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: >> > [The number of bytes in a `]$1['.]) >> ^^^^^ chars, actually >> >> sizeof(char) == 1 always holds, but it doesn't have to be a byte. > K&R1 says: It's outdated. The C and the C++ standards specify that sizeof(char)==1, but a char can be larger than a byte. > In any case, "the number of chars in a `long int'" seems > unnecessarily confusing. Indeed. How about ``The size of a `long int', as computed by sizeof''. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Bruno Haible
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Peter Eisentraut
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Peter Eisentraut
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZ... Akim Demaille
- Re: suggestion for AC_CHECK_SIZEOF Peter Eisentraut