On Apr 28, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think `missing' should not exit 0 when it doesn't know what to do Agreed. > IMHO the right patch is to teach `help2man' to `missing'. Or adjust autoconf's Makefiles to proceed even if help2man fails. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Akim Demaille
- Autoconf fails to install without help2man Mo DeJong
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Tom Tromey
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Mo DeJong
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Mo DeJong
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf fails to install without help2man Akim Demaille
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Mo DeJong
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Akim Demaille
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Akim Demaille
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Akim Demaille
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Pavel Roskin
- Re: Revamping AC_CANONICAL_* Akim Demaille