Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:45:23 +0200 (MET DST) From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This make logical sense build!=host indicates cross-compilation. Two problems with this: 1) For example, if build is some FreeBSD and host is some Linux, then you're not *really* cross-compiling. At least it would be an incompatible change to the definition. No, that's definitely cross-compiling. FreeBSD and Linux have different libraries and header files. At least some programs will wind up with different config.h files. 2) build and host, even when canonicalized, may be different for the same system, yielding to gratuitous failures under your proposal. If somebody specifies different --build and --host options, they are cross-compiling. In fact, under the new regime, if somebody specifies just --host, we can assume that they are cross-compiling. We should certainly never rely on comparing configuration names, and I don't think we are. Ian
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Earnie Boyd
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Mo DeJong
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Earnie Boyd
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch ... Peter Eisentraut
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Alexandre Oliva
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included... Akim Demaille
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux