On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Earnie Boyd wrote: > This make logical sense build!=host indicates cross-compilation. Two problems with this: 1) For example, if build is some FreeBSD and host is some Linux, then you're not *really* cross-compiling. At least it would be an incompatible change to the definition. 2) build and host, even when canonicalized, may be different for the same system, yielding to gratuitous failures under your proposal. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Earnie Boyd
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Mo DeJong
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Earnie Boyd
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch incl... Alexandre Oliva
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Bernard Dautrevaux