> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 6:00 AM
> To: Paul Berrevoets
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Ian Lance Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included)
> 
> 
> On Apr 26, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> >> Perhaps the mere presence of --host (or NOOPT) could give 
> a gentle hint
> >> that cross-compilation is at least tolerated (but not 
> forced). After all,
> >> why are you specifying it otherwise? The converse is of 
> course not true.
> 
> > Because you may want to provide an alias for the host 
> (native) system.
> 
> Yup.  I've found many packages whose config.guess would guess
> alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu, but whose config.sub wouldn't accept
> alphaev6, so I had to manually `configure alpha-unknown-linux-gnu'.
> Of course, in these cases, it is the package that's broken, for
> shipping incompatible versions of config.guess and config.sub, but I
> wouldn't want configure to think it's cross compiling just because
> I've specified the host system name.
> 

Just "./configure --build=alpha-unknown-linux-gnu" as in fact you are
building on an alpha-unknown-linux-gnu, and want a native compile...

Regards,

        Bernard

--------------------------------------------
Bernard Dautrevaux
Microprocess Ingéniérie
97 bis, rue de Colombes
92400 COURBEVOIE
FRANCE
Tel:    +33 (0) 1 47 68 80 80
Fax:    +33 (0) 1 47 88 97 85
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------- 

Reply via email to