Hello, Akim! > Pavel> Usage of HOST without --host= is error-prone and should be > Pavel> connsidered as deprecated (IMHO). > > So, would there be a strong opposition to its complete removal? I cannot say about "strong" opposition, but at least configure should exit with an error. The error message should perhaps mention "--host". I can imagine scripts using bare HOST, so we should be careful to inform people. It happened to me several times that a malformed option was understood as HOST. It is shame that "./configure foo" succeeds if AC_CANONICAL_* is not used. By the way, configure --help prints now: Usage: ./configure [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]... [HOST] ... Host type: --host=HOST configure for HOST [guessed] --build=BUILD configure for building on BUILD [BUILD=HOST] --target=TARGET configure for TARGET [TARGET=HOST] in all three cases: no AC_CANONICAL_*, AC_CANONICAL_HOST and AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM. This is quite inconsistent. Pavel
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Harlan Stenn
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor