Olly> Dear me. Actually, BCPL's truth value is -1, so I can believe early Olly> versions of C might behave the same way. It seems unlikely that this is important. Olly> I'm unsure how `int a[0];' will be handled by various compilers. gcc accepts this as an extension. It is useful when using the "struct hack", at least. Olly> Anyway, to sidestep this issue I double and add one. This is the best approach. Tom
- Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY... Steve Robbins
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Earnie Boyd
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC... Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses ... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC... Akim Demaille
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses ... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary u... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessa... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessa... Akim Demaille