tom> Paul says the current C standard doesn't allow [the struct hack], Paul> No, actually I said the _current_ C standard _does_ allow it--at least Paul> using the [0] notation; the current standard is C99 :). It's the Paul> _previous_ standard, C89, that doesn't :) Thanks. I keep forgetting that C99 is real. tom> but I thought there was a special exception precisely to allow tom> it. Paul> Nope. The C FAQ, question 2.6: Thanks. T
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Earnie Boyd
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY... Olly Betts
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY... Akim Demaille
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses ... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary u... Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary u... Akim Demaille