Hi Alice, These changes are complete:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-spf Thanks, Sabrina On Tue Jul 15 19:26:09 2025, aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote: > Hi IANA, > > Re: draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-51 (currently in AUTH48 as 9815), IANA > wrote: > > > ACTION 3: > > We've created the following registries under the "BGP Shortest Path > > First (BGP SPF)" registry group: > > BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > > BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > > BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > > > On https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-spf > please update as follows, per the reply from the author (pasted > below). > > OLD: > BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > > NEW: > BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values > BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values > BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values > > > Files are currently here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.xml > > This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815-rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ar > -- > > On Jul 3, 2025, at 9:39 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> 21) <!--[rfced] Please consider whether the registry names make > >> sense with > >> "Status" repeated, i.e., "Status TLV Status"? For example, is the > >> meaning > >> intact if the last word is removed? Or, we see examples of registry > >> names > >> that end with "TLV Types" or "TLV Values". > >> > >> Original [not a comprehensive list of instances]: > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" registry > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" registry > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" > >> registry > >> > >> Perhaps (if removing the last word): > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry > >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry > >> --> > > > > I spent way too much time on this and looked at the titles of many > > IANA registries. The convention seems to be use "Values" for > > situation such this one. > > the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry > > the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry > > the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
