Hi IANA, Re: draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-51 (currently in AUTH48 as 9815), IANA wrote:
> ACTION 3: > We've created the following registries under the "BGP Shortest Path First > (BGP SPF)" registry group: > BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status > BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status On https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-spf please update as follows, per the reply from the author (pasted below). OLD: BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status NEW: BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values Files are currently here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815.xml This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9815-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Thank you. RFC Editor/ar -- On Jul 3, 2025, at 9:39 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 21) <!--[rfced] Please consider whether the registry names make sense with >> "Status" repeated, i.e., "Status TLV Status"? For example, is the meaning >> intact if the last word is removed? Or, we see examples of registry names >> that end with "TLV Types" or "TLV Values". >> >> Original [not a comprehensive list of instances]: >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" registry >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" registry >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Status" registry >> >> Perhaps (if removing the last word): >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry >> the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV" registry >> --> > > I spent way too much time on this and looked at the titles of many IANA > registries. The convention seems to be use "Values" for situation such this > one. > the "BGP-LS-SPF Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry > the "BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry > the "BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV Values" registry -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
