Hi Jim, Thanks for the quick reply! We marked your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9790).
Best regards, RFC Editor/rv > On Jun 26, 2025, at 10:19 AM, James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> > wrote: > > Looks good to me. Approved. > Jim > From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrhee...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2025 at 1:18 PM > To: James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>, Kireeti Kompella > <kireeti.i...@gmail.com>, Loa Andersson <l...@pi.nu>, Dongjie (Jimmy) > <jie.d...@huawei.com>, Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>, > Stewart Bryant <s...@stewartbryant.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> > Cc: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>, RFC Editor > <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>, m...@ietf.org<m...@ietf.org>, mpls-...@ietf.org > <mpls-...@ietf.org>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-cha...@ietf.org>, auth48archive > <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> > Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9790 <draft-ietf-mpls-1stnibble-13> > Hi Jim, > > As AD, please review and approve the change in paragraph 3 of Section 2.5. > This change is best viewed in one of the following diff files: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888245809%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7HzMrW0d359isqQmelX9hFEA4Z8g%2BoCQKAAxJJnt8yA%3D&reserved=0or > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888283528%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5Yn%2BocQm6DHD%2BC2f%2FxbjYAzmQ8tmo3P6ETkQTHlteu0%3D&reserved=0. > We have also included the change here: > > Original: > It would assist with the progress toward a simpler, more coherent > system of MPLS data encapsulation if the use a PSH for non-IP > payloads encapsulated in MPLS was obsoleted. > > Current: > Section 2 of [RFC4385] suggests the use of a PSH solely for the > purpose of avoiding IP ECMP treatment of non-IP payloads encapsulated > in MPLS. Obsoleting this use of a PSH would assist with the progress > toward a simpler, more coherent system of MPLS data encapsulation. > (Other uses of a PSH may still be valid.) > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/rv > > > > > On Jun 26, 2025, at 5:30 AM, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.i...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Thank you, Rebecca. > > > > I’m fine with continuing to use Post-stack First Nibble/PFN. > > > > Kireeti. > > > >> On 23 Jun 2025, at 14:17, Rebecca VanRheenen > >> <rvanrhee...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kireeti and Loa, > >> > >> Kireeti, thank you for your review and suggestions! We have updated the > >> document accordingly, except for the following: > >> > >> Current: > >> Post-stack First Nibble (PFN) > >> > >> Suggested: > >> Post-Stack First Nibble (PFN) > >> > >> As Loa notes, the use of lowercase aligns the expansion with the chosen > >> abbreviation, so we suggest leaving this as is. However, if all authors > >> all agree to capitalize “-Stack” in this expansion, we suggest also adding > >> “S” to the abbreviation (i.e., “PSFN”). Note that this would mean 31 > >> updates of "PFN" to “PSFN”. Please let us know your thoughts. > >> > >> Note that once this is addressed, we will ask Jim (as AD) to review and > >> approve the change in paragraph 3 of Section 2.5. > >> > >> — FILES (please refresh) — > >> > >> Updated XML file: > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888296536%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eH5zCFGhv3Zkm%2B7rHKt1p2XR6Btg5PmApbHFI3afRWc%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> Updated output files: > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888308684%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=esU6h%2BnzqRTw6pN802emtNpAedUw5oN11bV98CmrhW4%3D&reserved=0 > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888320089%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=AoGb%2BJgUrhoULoT3tt%2FfMrZIQAaOZiEsVccno1wZQx4%3D&reserved=0 > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888332102%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=87F7d4iZMat9qyxa11uKWvbtwc1lSGGf1ArAReU%2BHGE%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48: > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888343902%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0w8dhXLM47bT%2FpWiNuIBAn5xR%2BjoRsRsCbgD4THMWQk%3D&reserved=0 > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888355053%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cN7eUOUhFB99SXqBSdZAVfYIUQV9gdOJKU2rwuXlmjE%3D&reserved=0 > >> (side by side) > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888366077%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QTq8LsM9%2BG6LLBxEhWL%2F9lMqyMzdqvaGBu5vyR9YZtU%3D&reserved=0 > >> (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this) > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888376914%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=L67mrAbEnSTnZgFCACte0Er0xZMcM6XLXI7ZbGtnGqw%3D&reserved=0 > >> (rfcdiff between last version and this) > >> > >> Diff files showing all changes: > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888388434%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jbvN99r41etcbPzIfY3WH6FTc7gXbAh7SzMiAltA4bQ%3D&reserved=0 > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888399627%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=m8fc6X4Z3%2FD9%2F13EAhasfqkhhTRwwLstJYP%2Fz%2Bifc6o%3D&reserved=0 > >> (side by side) > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888410859%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kCBqbx%2Fhjbfv%2F4m6UElbp3DovbNc8QEk%2BeKdUCZPL8Y%3D&reserved=0 > >> (diff showing changes where text is moved or deleted) > >> > >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > >> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9790&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888425859%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=f4Bc1%2F%2FglhiCI8Vx6qkDSco4CzVHLHEhxmFmhmA7HzM%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> Thank you, > >> RFC Editor/rv > >> > >> > >>> On Jun 21, 2025, at 11:03 AM, Loa Andersson <l...@pi.nu> wrote: > >>> > >>> All, > >>> > >>> I'm OK with the change Section 2.5, para 3 of RFC 4385. > >>> > >>> I'm more uncertain about doing > >>> > >>> Post-Stack First Nibble (PFN) > >>> > >>> raather than > >>> > >>> Post-stack First Nibble (PFN) > >>> > >>> I thought capitalising in the name indicated the letters chosen for the > >>> abbreviation. > >>> > >>> /Loa > >>> > >>> Den 21/06/2025 kl. 10:07, skrev Kireeti Kompella: > >>>> Hi Rebecca, > >>>> Apologies for the very late response. I seem to have lost the original > >>>> email, but I do have this thread, so replying here. > >>>> Thank you for the detailed review and the great work making this > >>>> document immensely more readable! I sincerely appreciate it. > >>>> Since several comments have been made and addressed, I looked at the > >>>> “all changes” diffs and commented on them. Excuse the colorful cut-n- > >>>> paste from the side-by-side diffs. > >>>> There is one _important change_ that I suggest; this will need to be > >>>> reviewed by the shepherd, the WG chairs and ADs. I'm putting it first. > >>>> The rest of my comments are mostly NITs. Most things “Post-Stack” have a > >>>> capital S, but “Post-stack First Nibble” consistently uses a lower case > >>>> s. That bothers me, but it may be just me. > >>>> There are a couple of indefinite articles that I think should be changed > >>>> (one added, one deleted). Finally, an unwanted hyphen in “load > >>>> balancing”, to be consistent. > >>>> ——— > >>>> Section 2.5, para 3 > >>>> OLD > >>>> Obsoleting the use of a PSH for non-IP payloads encapsulated in MPLS > >>>> would assist with the progress toward a simpler, more coherent system > >>>> of MPLS data encapsulation. However, before that can be done, it is ... > >>>> NEW > >>>> RFC 4385, Section 2 suggests the use of a PSH solely for the purpose > >>>> of avoiding IP ECMP treatment of non-IP payloads encapsulated in MPLS. > >>>> Obsoleting this use of a PSH would assist with the progress toward a > >>>> simpler, more coherent system of MPLS data encapsulation. (Other uses > >>>> of a PSH may still be valid.) However, before that can be done, it is > >>>> ... > >>>> ——— > >>>> Section 1, para 1 > >>>> /* NIT */ > >>>> OLD > >>>> correct interpretation of the : > >>> > >>> > >>> in a PSH > >>>> NEW > >>>> correct interpretation of the Post-Stack First Nibble (PFN) in a PSH > >>>> Section 1, para 7 > >>>> /*NIT*/ > >>>> OLD > >>>> this document enable a more robust network operation. > >>>> NEW > >>>> this document enable more robust network operation. > >>>> Section 1.2, para 6 > >>>> /* NIT */ > >>>> OLD > >>>> Post-stack First Nibble (PFN): The most significant four bits of the > >>>> NEW > >>>> Post-Stack First Nibble (PFN): The most significant four bits of the > >>>> Section 1.3 > >>>> /* NIT */ > >>>> OLD > >>>> PFN: Post-stack First Nibble > >>>> NEW > >>>> PFN: Post-Stack First Nibble > >>>> Section 1.4 > >>>> OLD > >>>> Figure 2: Examples of an MPLS Packet Payload With and Without > >>>> Preceding Post-Stack Header > >>>> NEW > >>>> Figure 2: Examples of an MPLS Packet Payload With and Without > >>>> a Preceding Post-Stack Header > >>>> Section 2.1.1.1, para 4 > >>>> OLD > >>>> heuristic can work very badly for non-IP packet as shown in example B > >>>> in Figure 2. For example, if payload B is an Ethernet frame, then > >>>> NEW > >>>> heuristic can work very badly for the non-IP packet as shown in example > >>>> B in Figure 2. For example, if payload B is an Ethernet frame, then > >>>> Section 2.2, para 5 > >>>> /* NIT */ > >>>> OLD > >>>> | (Post-stack First Nibble) value that is neither 0x4 nor 0x6 in all > >>>> NEW > >>>> | (Post-Stack First Nibble) value that is neither 0x4 nor 0x6 in all > >>>> Section 2.2, last para > >>>> /*NIT*/ > >>>> | PFN: Post-stack First Nibble > >>>> NEW > >>>> | PFN: Post-Stack First Nibble > >>>> Section 2.5, para 3 > >>>> OLD > >>>> or deployed implementations using the heuristic practice to load- > >>>> balancing MPLS data flows. > >>>> NEW > >>>> or deployed implementations using the heuristic practice to load > >>>> balancing MPLS data flows. > >>>> (Frankly, I would prefer “to load balance MPLS data flows” to “to load > >>>> balancing …”.) > >>>> Kireeti. > >>>>> On 20 Jun 2025, at 22:18, Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrhee...@staff.rfc- > >>>>> editor.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello all, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you for the replies. We added the sentence that Loa suggested to > >>>>> the Acknowledgments section with a small edit. We also incorporated the > >>>>> changes sent by Jie. These changes are best viewed in the alt-diff or > >>>>> lastdiff files listed below. > >>>>> > >>>>> Loa and Stewart, we have marked your approvals on the AUTH48 status > >>>>> page for this document. Jim, we have also marked your AD approval. See > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9790&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888440550%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZG6hLh2c%2FaBNWLhI98OKFZWm8ujR%2FVu7rwWltXCkXjo%3D&reserved=0. > >>>>> > >>>>> We are now waiting for approvals or further updates from Jie and > >>>>> Kireeti. > >>>>> > >>>>> — FILES (please refresh) — > >>>>> > >>>>> Updated XML file: > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888451430%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nlSluOEp99gZO6U1WgeTs9KvmVJ4NcbmRleN6ArT6lE%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> Updated output files: > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888461431%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ebvl44b5CdsjpxhYfQl3ZcGzRIr%2FcvoIxtOcnaIqdEk%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888471068%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=10yhlrLZTFCb2oG6zU8FBX1v9SucEAF6w99HtK%2BZ6UM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888481129%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=y7UsJiiaHYDufF%2By5OBglRJAvDoyIvN25u61ZN%2B83h0%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48: > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888490883%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yClQ2fP%2Bhgj6F54yeUSdXhjNAw2M4Up2sBjlAL4tW7U%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888500480%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=H6RO4GNnaT%2B2wvcNiOUM2Ji0%2BkOUP%2BBQiJ8yvz4wUPc%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> (side by side) > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888509954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fqoPRpw67RHn0tzpQeagcyzEcKuimveT9HK13IefdFw%3D&reserved=0(htmlwdiff > >>>>> diff between last version and this) > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888519383%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iRgAk9M0KXl84xh%2FeaRQXF3Dpo0Tyh%2BW494VQK%2Fcx5E%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> (rfcdiff between last version and this) > >>>>> > >>>>> Diff files showing all changes: > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888528757%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IMN5IwYC27KExKiESXGBg7Yv0U1FUB9iUp%2BNDP042p4%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888537929%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hk4EFgYxV1bsNtwXK2N2%2BVxyTMrWZlR3RtzDqzUHiPE%3D&reserved=0(side > >>>>> by side) > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888547173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LkaeQNKK8frC%2Fencbx99zB2Zc3%2Fr67PGWZdptviGJFk%3D&reserved=0(diff > >>>>> showing changes where text is moved or deleted) > >>>>> > >>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > >>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9790&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888556416%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qufyw9X%2B3rkzMKnA9unxRKxyZ5sGa66B%2Fw%2F4uhwBdcI%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you, > >>>>> RFC Editor/rv > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Jun 20, 2025, at 11:36 AM, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, thanks for you diligence, Jie. Those changes are needed. > >>>>>> Adrian > >>>>>>> On 20/06/2025 15:27 BST Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.d...@huawei.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Rebecca, > >>>>>>> Thanks for the effort on this update. > >>>>>>> The update to the definition of "MPLS payload" and "Post-Stack Header > >>>>>>> (PSH)" looks good. While I found that in section 1.4, there is one > >>>>>>> usage of "MPLS payload" which needs to be updated to align with the > >>>>>>> current definition. > >>>>>>> OLD: > >>>>>>> Example C: This example is an MPLS Payload that starts with a PSH > >>>>>>> followed by the embedded packet. Here, the embedded packet could be > >>>>>>> IP or non-IP. > >>>>>>> Since the current definition says the MPLS Payload is after the label > >>>>>>> stack and optional PSHs, the text in this example also needs to be > >>>>>>> updated. > >>>>>>> Here is the suggested text: > >>>>>>> NEW: > >>>>>>> Example C: This example is an MPLS Payload that follows a PSH. Here, > >>>>>>> the embedded packet could be IP or non-IP. > >>>>>>> And the title of Figure 2 needs to be updated accordingly: > >>>>>>> OLD: > >>>>>>> Figure 2: Examples of an MPLS Packet Payload With and Without Post- > >>>>>>> Stack Header. > >>>>>>> New: > >>>>>>> Figure 2: Examples of an MPLS Packet Payload With and Without > >>>>>>> Preceding Post-Stack Header > >>>>>>> Hope this helps. > >>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>> Jie > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrhee...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:51 AM > >>>>>>>> To: Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>; Loa Andersson <l...@pi.nu>; > >>>>>>>> Kireeti > >>>>>>>> Kompella <kireeti.i...@gmail.com>; Matthew Bocci (Nokia) > >>>>>>>> <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>; Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com>; > >>>>>>>> Stewart Bryant <s...@stewartbryant.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) > >>>>>>>> <jie.d...@huawei.com>; James Guichard > >>>>>>>> <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> > >>>>>>>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; m...@ietf.org; mpls- > >>>>>>>> a...@ietf.org; > >>>>>>>> MPLS Working Group <mpls-cha...@ietf.org>; auth48archive > >>>>>>>> <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> > >>>>>>>> Subject: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9790 <draft-ietf- > >>>>>>>> mpls-1stnibble-13> > >>>>>>>> Hi Adrian, authors, and Jim*, > >>>>>>>> Adrian - Thank you for providing the updated text. We have updated > >>>>>>>> the files > >>>>>>>> accordingly (see list of files below) > >>>>>>>> Authors - Please let us know if you approve of the document in its > >>>>>>>> current form > >>>>>>>> or if any further updates are needed. > >>>>>>>> *Jim - As AD, please review the changes to the definitions for "MPLS > >>>>>>>> Payload” > >>>>>>>> and "Post-Stack Header (PSH)” in Section 1.2 and let us know if you > >>>>>>>> approve. > >>>>>>>> These changes are best viewed in this diff file: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888565511%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d%2FIHDDfLnyz%2FbId1pnf9gz4DxEhPbXh1vF5OxRxwnhs%3D&reserved=0. > >>>>>>>> — FILES (please refresh) — > >>>>>>>> Updated XML file: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888576044%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zMrnzz0ycksD0noCtw2BgauiioIBwdQat1QgGYwjx10%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> Updated output files: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888586450%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qnABwQk5akWUXWLk1k8SqUFr3QteskIbL5yjjcrb5gM%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888596220%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bb0fpdwg%2BLSTggb%2B5%2F8wvSCdn7rKHefLKfg7i%2B%2FvT1w%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> editor.org/authors/rfc9790.pdf > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888605695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kzdvntT%2BttHuA8D5m5O8Wpf4ZZgcpxmHLcMhkADPx0s%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> rfc9790.html Diff file showing changes made during AUTH48: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888615026%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d3Bu3axVuTinTfXodDGVoIt4RTtQ5sq6onxveXFHArg%3D&reserved=0https:// > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-auth48rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888623991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=g4fVVj6sdllC0KA9WPblhWHJq6gbWuew20DdPyKqOs0%3D&reserved=0(side > >>>>>>>> by side) > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888633042%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Num0YJh4HhChz6NPz%2BRFZ5wFmg452BukJ%2B92qIHr0yw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> (htmlwdiff diff > >>>>>>>> between last version and this) > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-lastrfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888641992%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rnfg4NqCln9K99K6YZLa0J6eI0M4x8AWuj0Mag2bPMg%3D&reserved=0(rfcdiff > >>>>>>>> between > >>>>>>>> last version and this) > >>>>>>>> Diff files showing all changes: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888651448%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wsBdjWN8AV1pIWHl4OyyEf8nWADDZoJX5OeoEMQlAdY%3D&reserved=0https:// > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888660430%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=inYfVrJ2vhycSlYxrylgG2lvt8E9UbFKYYOVrQDdmBg%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> (side by side) > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888669320%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8ukHvoOcM0di7MhYh2nl%2FN7qUt8NVxcqLOcuvT4G2NQ%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> (diff showing > >>>>>>>> changes where text is moved or deleted) > >>>>>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9790&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888678475%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XkWm7L2bteYLveqErTpiFFtQk1v2nt40fmnEQK3dHnE%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> Thank you, > >>>>>>>> RFC Editor/rv > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2025, at 1:20 PM, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> RFC Editor (Rebecca), authors, Working Group, > >>>>>>>>> Document Shepherd here. > >>>>>>>>> This document seemed to stagnate over the discussion of a couple of > >>>>>>>>> minor > >>>>>>>> editorial points. So I have been chatting with Greg and Loa, and we > >>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>> agreed some changes that seem to address the concerns. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have based these changes on the text at > >>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9790.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C4867a1d70aed49b3897308ddb4d56870%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638865550888688154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bY1lTNAgPJDDogUqM0%2BqiRpy%2BnZtRCpW2vCBbyRo82g%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Section 1.2 > >>>>>>>>> OLD > >>>>>>>>> MPLS Payload: All data after the label stack and the optional Post- > >>>>>>>>> Stack header. > >>>>>>>>> NEW > >>>>>>>>> MPLS Payload: All data after the label stack and any optional PSHs. > >>>>>>>>> It > >>>>>>>>> is possible that more than one type of PSH may be present in a > >>>>>>>>> packet, and some PSH specifications might allow multiple PSHs of > >>>>>>>>> the same type. The presence rules for multiple PSHs are a matter > >>>>>>>>> for the documents that define those PSHs, e.g., in > >>>>>>>>> [I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-ps-hdr]. > >>>>>>>>> END > >>>>>>>>> Section 1.2 > >>>>>>>>> OLD > >>>>>>>>> Post-Stack Header (PSH): A field containing information that may be > >>>>>>>>> of interest to the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) or transit > >>>>>>>>> LSRs. Examples include a control word [RFC4385] [RFC8964] or an > >>>>>>>>> associated channel header [RFC4385] [RFC5586] [RFC9546]. A parser > >>>>>>>>> needs to be able to determine where the PSH ends in order to find > >>>>>>>>> the embedded packet. > >>>>>>>>> NEW > >>>>>>>>> Post-Stack Header (PSH): A field containing information that may be > >>>>>>>>> of interest to the egress Label Switching Router (LSR) or transit > >>>>>>>>> LSRs. Examples include a control word [RFC4385] [RFC8964] or an > >>>>>>>>> associated channel header [RFC4385] [RFC5586] [RFC9546]. > >>>>>>>>> END > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I hope with these two changes, all of the authors can confirm their > >>>>>>>>> AUTH48 > >>>>>>>> proposal. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Adrian > >>>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Loa Andersson > >>> Senior MPLS Expert > >>> Bronze Dragon Consulting > >>> l...@pi.nu > >>> loa.pi....@gmail.com > >>> > >> > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
