Hi Alanna, 

Sorry I missed that; this is fixed:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep

Thanks,
Sabrina

On Tue Mar 11 20:10:45 2025, apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote:
> Hi Sabrina,
> 
> Just one nit. Please update "NATIVE IP” to "Native IP” in the "PCECC-
> CAPABILITY sub-TLV” registry
> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcecc-capability>.
> 
> Old:
> Bit     Name
> 30      NATIVE IP
> 
> New:
>  Bit     Name
>  30      Native IP
> 
> Diff file is here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html
> 
> Best regards,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
> > On Mar 11, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
> > mat...@iana.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alanna,
> >
> > We've updated the registries accordingly. Please see
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sabrina
> >
> > On Mon Mar 10 19:50:52 2025, apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote:
> >> IANA,
> >>
> >> Please update your registries as follows to match the edited
> >> document
> >> at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html.
> >>
> >>
> >> 1) Please update the capitalization of the Name for the following
> >> Bit
> >> in the “PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV” registry
> >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcecc-capability>.
> >>
> >> Old:
> >> Bit     Name
> >> 30      NATIVE IP (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-08-14, extension
> >> registered 2024-07-31, expires 2025-08-14)
> >>
> >> New:
> >> Bit     Name
> >> 30      Native IP
> >>
> >>
> >> 2) Please update the following Error-values in the "PCEP-ERROR
> >> Object
> >> Error Types and Values” registry
> >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object>
> >> by adding a serial comma and removing hyphens.
> >>
> >> Old:
> >> Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
> >> 19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI,
> >> EPR
> >> or PPA object can be included in this message
> >>                                                        29: Attempted
> >> Native-IP operations when the capability was not advertised
> >>                                                        30: Unknown
> >> Native-IP Info
> >>
> >> New:
> >> Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
> >> 19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI,
> >> EPR,
> >> or PPA object can be included in this message
> >>                                                        29: Attempted
> >> Native IP operations when the capability was not advertised
> >>                                                        30: Unknown
> >> Native IP Info
> >>
> >>
> >> 3) Please update the name of the "CCI Object Flag Field for Native-
> >> IP”
> >> registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#cci-
> >> object-
> >> flag-field-native-ip> by removing the hyphen between “Native” and
> >> “IP”.
> >>
> >> Old:
> >> CCI Object Flag Field for Native-IP
> >>
> >> New:
> >> CCI Object Flag Field for Native IP
> >>
> >>
> >> 4) Please update the commas to hyphens in the "BPI Object Error Code
> >> Field” registry
> >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-
> >> object-error-code-field>.
> >>
> >> Old:
> >> Value   Meaning
> >> 1               ASes does not match, BGP Session Failure
> >> 2               Peer IP can't be reached, BGP Session Failure
> >>
> >> New:
> >> Value           Meaning
> >> 1               ASes do not match - BGP Session Failure
> >> 2               Peer IP can't be reached - BGP Session Failure
> >>
> >>
> >> 5) Please update "(IPnIP)” to be "(IP-in-IP)” in the "BPI Object
> >> Flag
> >> Field” registry
> >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-
> >> object-flag-field>.
> >>
> >> Old:
> >> Bit     Meaning
> >> 7       T (IPnIP) bit
> >>
> >> New:
> >> Bit     Meaning
> >> 7       T (IP-in-IP) bit
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> RFC Editor/ap
> >>
> >>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
> >>> editor.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Authors and John (AD),
> >>>
> >>> With John’s confirmation, we have removed Ren Tan as an author and
> >>> moved his name to the Contributors section.
> >>>
> >>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.xml
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.txt
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.html
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.pdf
> >>>
> >>> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html (comprehensive
> >>> diff)
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-auth48diff.html (AUTH48
> >>> changes)
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff
> >>> diff between last version and this)
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastrfcdiff.html
> >>> (rfcdiff
> >>> between last version and this)
> >>>
> >>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9757
> >>>
> >>> We will now ask IANA to update its registry accordingly. After the
> >>> IANA updates are complete, we will move forward with the
> >>> publication
> >>> process.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> RFC Editor/ap
> >>>
> >>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 11:30 AM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the follow up. Yes please, since nobody has objected,
> >>>> let
> >>>> us do that.
> >>>>
> >>>> —John
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 2:21 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
> >>>>> editor.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi John,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We are just following up for your confirmation that Ren Tan
> >>>>> should
> >>>>> be moved to the Contributors section.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>> RFC Editor/ap
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 4:56 PM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for the info, Alanna.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Authors — if you have any input for me regarding the most
> >>>>>> appropriate course of action, please let me know in the next few
> >>>>>> days. If you would prefer to send me your feedback privately and
> >>>>>> confidentially, you can do that (but of course you don’t have
> >>>>>> to).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Unless I receive feedback suggesting some other course of action
> >>>>>> by Monday, I will request Ren Tan to be moved to the contributor
> >>>>>> section.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> —John
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 7:35 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
> >>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>> John - It seems the authors have been unable to contact Ren Tan
> >>>>>>> for his approval. As noted in the RFC Editor FAQ
> >>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-
> >>>>>>> editor.org/faq/*missingauthor__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-
> >>>>>>> gk!HIjRag8oSVImlK5t9YVeaNwIjEfXdV1w8UiDAK63nov9JK7WijHVn9LzfhqAlcj7fbLS4qxBEPY3unuXuQmrFQE$
> >>>>>>>> , we recommend one of the following paths if the author is
> >>>>>>> unreachable:
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to