No worries. All updates look good now. Thank you!

> On Mar 11, 2025, at 9:18 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-mat...@iana.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alanna, 
> 
> Sorry I missed that; this is fixed:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep
> 
> Thanks,
> Sabrina
> 
> On Tue Mar 11 20:10:45 2025, apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote:
>> Hi Sabrina,
>> 
>> Just one nit. Please update "NATIVE IP” to "Native IP” in the "PCECC-
>> CAPABILITY sub-TLV” registry
>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcecc-capability>.
>> 
>> Old:
>> Bit     Name
>> 30      NATIVE IP
>> 
>> New:
>> Bit     Name
>> 30      Native IP
>> 
>> Diff file is here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> RFC Editor/ap
>> 
>>> On Mar 11, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-
>>> mat...@iana.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alanna,
>>> 
>>> We've updated the registries accordingly. Please see
>>> 
>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sabrina
>>> 
>>> On Mon Mar 10 19:50:52 2025, apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote:
>>>> IANA,
>>>> 
>>>> Please update your registries as follows to match the edited
>>>> document
>>>> at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Please update the capitalization of the Name for the following
>>>> Bit
>>>> in the “PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV” registry
>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcecc-capability>.
>>>> 
>>>> Old:
>>>> Bit     Name
>>>> 30      NATIVE IP (TEMPORARY - registered 2023-08-14, extension
>>>> registered 2024-07-31, expires 2025-08-14)
>>>> 
>>>> New:
>>>> Bit     Name
>>>> 30      Native IP
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Please update the following Error-values in the "PCEP-ERROR
>>>> Object
>>>> Error Types and Values” registry
>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object>
>>>> by adding a serial comma and removing hyphens.
>>>> 
>>>> Old:
>>>> Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
>>>> 19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI,
>>>> EPR
>>>> or PPA object can be included in this message
>>>>                                                       29: Attempted
>>>> Native-IP operations when the capability was not advertised
>>>>                                                       30: Unknown
>>>> Native-IP Info
>>>> 
>>>> New:
>>>> Error-Type      Meaning                 Error-value
>>>> 19                      Invalid Operation       22: Only one BPI,
>>>> EPR,
>>>> or PPA object can be included in this message
>>>>                                                       29: Attempted
>>>> Native IP operations when the capability was not advertised
>>>>                                                       30: Unknown
>>>> Native IP Info
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3) Please update the name of the "CCI Object Flag Field for Native-
>>>> IP”
>>>> registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#cci-
>>>> object-
>>>> flag-field-native-ip> by removing the hyphen between “Native” and
>>>> “IP”.
>>>> 
>>>> Old:
>>>> CCI Object Flag Field for Native-IP
>>>> 
>>>> New:
>>>> CCI Object Flag Field for Native IP
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 4) Please update the commas to hyphens in the "BPI Object Error Code
>>>> Field” registry
>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-
>>>> object-error-code-field>.
>>>> 
>>>> Old:
>>>> Value   Meaning
>>>> 1               ASes does not match, BGP Session Failure
>>>> 2               Peer IP can't be reached, BGP Session Failure
>>>> 
>>>> New:
>>>> Value           Meaning
>>>> 1               ASes do not match - BGP Session Failure
>>>> 2               Peer IP can't be reached - BGP Session Failure
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 5) Please update "(IPnIP)” to be "(IP-in-IP)” in the "BPI Object
>>>> Flag
>>>> Field” registry
>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#bpi-
>>>> object-flag-field>.
>>>> 
>>>> Old:
>>>> Bit     Meaning
>>>> 7       T (IPnIP) bit
>>>> 
>>>> New:
>>>> Bit     Meaning
>>>> 7       T (IP-in-IP) bit
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 12:45 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Authors and John (AD),
>>>>> 
>>>>> With John’s confirmation, we have removed Ren Tan as an author and
>>>>> moved his name to the Contributors section.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.xml
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.txt
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.html
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757.pdf
>>>>> 
>>>>> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-diff.html (comprehensive
>>>>> diff)
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-auth48diff.html (AUTH48
>>>>> changes)
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff
>>>>> diff between last version and this)
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9757-lastrfcdiff.html
>>>>> (rfcdiff
>>>>> between last version and this)
>>>>> 
>>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9757
>>>>> 
>>>>> We will now ask IANA to update its registry accordingly. After the
>>>>> IANA updates are complete, we will move forward with the
>>>>> publication
>>>>> process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 11:30 AM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the follow up. Yes please, since nobody has objected,
>>>>>> let
>>>>>> us do that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> —John
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 2:21 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We are just following up for your confirmation that Ren Tan
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> be moved to the Contributors section.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> RFC Editor/ap
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 4:56 PM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info, Alanna.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Authors — if you have any input for me regarding the most
>>>>>>>> appropriate course of action, please let me know in the next few
>>>>>>>> days. If you would prefer to send me your feedback privately and
>>>>>>>> confidentially, you can do that (but of course you don’t have
>>>>>>>> to).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Unless I receive feedback suggesting some other course of action
>>>>>>>> by Monday, I will request Ren Tan to be moved to the contributor
>>>>>>>> section.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> —John
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 7:35 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-
>>>>>>>>>> editor.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> John - It seems the authors have been unable to contact Ren Tan
>>>>>>>>> for his approval. As noted in the RFC Editor FAQ
>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-
>>>>>>>>> editor.org/faq/*missingauthor__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-
>>>>>>>>> gk!HIjRag8oSVImlK5t9YVeaNwIjEfXdV1w8UiDAK63nov9JK7WijHVn9LzfhqAlcj7fbLS4qxBEPY3unuXuQmrFQE$
>>>>>>>>>> , we recommend one of the following paths if the author is
>>>>>>>>> unreachable:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to