Greetings,

Just checking to see if there has been any progress with RFCs-to-be 9664 and 
9665? 

Thanks,
RFC Editor/sg



> On Feb 11, 2025, at 6:55 AM, Edward Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> The situation at present is that all edits are based on the RFCs-to-be, and 
> are in github. I don't think it's technically possible to submit an RFC-to-be 
> as an internet draft, but we expect the working group to want to review the 
> changes. That being the case, we may back out just the RFC keyword changes in 
> order to produce something that can be published as a -26 draft, but leave 
> those in on github. I would suggest that top-of-tree on github would be the 
> document for the RFC editor to work on, rather than the intermediate draft, 
> if we follow that plan.
> 
> I think we need to have a conversation with Eric and possibly the WG chairs 
> about next steps once the edits are done.
> 
>> On Feb 11, 2025, at 15:20, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Stuart,
>> 
>> Thank you much for the update.  For our understanding, is it correct that 
>> your edits will be in the edited copy of RFCs-to-be 9664 and 9665 (i.e., are 
>> the RPC edits being incorporated into GitHub as well), as opposed to the 
>> approved draft?  We ask because you mentioned possibly submitting a new 
>> draft next week, and we are hopeful that any new draft would be based on the 
>> the most current file possible.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> RFC Editor/st
>> 
>>> On Feb 7, 2025, at 4:14 PM, Stuart Cheshire <chesh...@apple.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Feb 5, 2025, at 15:45, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello Ted, Stuart, and Éric,
>>>> 
>>>> We do not believe we have received the XML file from you yet. It appears 
>>>> that the last update was on 1/20/25.
>>> 
>>> Sorry Sarah. I made my final edits for draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease (9664) 
>>> and sent the email about it on 20th January saying that the document was 
>>> complete and ready for Ted’s final review, but it appears we had an email 
>>> delivery failure of some kind because Ted never received the email. I have 
>>> just talked about this with Ted via text message, and I have re-sent the 
>>> lost email to Ted’s apple.com email address for Ted to address on Monday.
>>> 
>>> This week I am in Philadelphia for the Thread Group Board of Directors 
>>> meeting. On my flight back to California this weekend I will go through my 
>>> handwritten notes for draft-ietf-dnssd-srp (9665) and make the necessary 
>>> GitHub edits, so that they are also ready for Ted to review on Monday 
>>> morning. Ted mentioned that we may want to get a final working group review 
>>> for 9665 to make sure everyone agrees with the changes. We will talk with 
>>> Éric Vyncke and get his advice. IETF 122 in Bangkok is just five weeks away 
>>> now, so one possible plan could be: We make the edits, submit 
>>> draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-09 next week, give the working group four 
>>> weeks for a final review, and then wrap it up in person at the Bangkok 
>>> meeting.
>>> 
>>> Stuart Cheshire
>>> 
>> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to