Hello Ted, Stuart, and Éric,

We do not believe we have heard from you regarding this document set since 
12/05/2024, when we requested to be notified when the updates to the relevant 
GitHub repos and additional WG reviews were complete.

Note that this document set has been in AUTH48 since mid-September, 2024. 
Please let us know if there is anything we can do to facilitate moving the 
AUTH48 review forward.

Sincerely,
RFC Editor/st

> On Jan 2, 2025, at 9:25 AM, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@amsl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ted and Stuart,
> 
> I'm checking in to see if the updates to the relevant GitHub repos and 
> additional WG reviews are complete.
> 
> If so, please send the links to the correct repos so we may continue the 
> AUTH48 review.
> 
> As always, please let me know if there is anything we can do to facilitate 
> moving the AUTH48 review forward.
> 
> Sincerely,
> RFC Editor/st
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@amsl.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ted,
>> 
>> Noted!
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/st
>> 
>>> On Dec 5, 2024, at 3:16 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, those are the correct repos.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 9:33 PM Sarah Tarrant <starr...@amsl.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Ted and Stuart.
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your replies and status updates.
>>> 
>>> Please let us know when updates to the relevant GitHub repos and additional 
>>> WG reviews are complete.  Note that we will review the updates and seek AD 
>>> approval as needed.
>>> 
>>> For clarity, please confirm that these are the GitHub repos being updated:
>>> • 
>>> https://github.com/dnssd-wg/draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease/blob/main/draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease.xml
>>> • 
>>> https://github.com/dnssd-wg/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp/blob/main/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp.xml
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> RFC Editor/st
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2024, at 7:11 PM, Stuart Cheshire <chesh...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2024, at 10:11, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@amsl.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Authors and AD,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please see mail below regarding this document as well as our cluster-wide 
>>>>> email with questions relating to all three related documents.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This document set has been in AUTH48 since mid-September. Please let us 
>>>>> know if there is anything we can do to facilitate moving the AUTH48 
>>>>> review forward.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> RFC Editor/st
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry for the delay Sarah. I was busy in October preparing for the IETF 
>>>> meeting, and then we had the Thanksgiving break. Ted and I are working on 
>>>> the document edits. We have not forgotten about this and we made more 
>>>> progress today.
>>>> 
>>>> Right now, unfortunately, I am having to focus on preparing my 
>>>> presentation for the Domos “Understanding Latency” workshop next week: 
>>>> <https://understandinglatency.com/>
>>>> 
>>>> After the Understanding Latency workshop Ted and I will wrap up these 
>>>> documents.
>>>> 
>>>> Stuart Cheshire
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to